- dotrising.com
- Compare
- WP23 vs Camon 20 Pro
Oukitel WP23 vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What WP23 does better (3) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display7.2
2.7Camera6.4
9.5Battery6.0
5.6Features4.2
Why is WP23 better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- CPU frequency2.35 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+7%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than WP23?
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · WP23: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · WP23: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 395 ppi+47%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 32 MP6.4×
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 190 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.8 mm |
| Height | — | 163.4 mm |
| Width | — | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 100 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15vsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6
vs
Tecno Camon 40 ProvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
8.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Tecno Camon 20 ProvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6