- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Flat 3C vs Poco C81 Pro
OSCAL Flat 3C vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
What Flat 3C does better (7) and where Poco C81 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display6.3
4.2Camera3.4
3.5Battery6.6
3.2Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flat 3CPoco C81 Pro
| Flat 3C | Poco C81 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.3 mm | 171.6 mm | −6.3 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 79.5 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 208 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flat 3C better than Poco C81 Pro?
- Main camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Repairability classB vs C
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+11%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 254 ppi+6%
- Weight200 g vs 208 g+4%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Poco C81 Pro better than Flat 3C?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Flat 3C: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Peak brightness430 nits vs 800 nits+86%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Energy classB vs A
- Drop resistance classC vs A
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Endurance per cycle48 h vs 67 h+41%
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 165.3 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Blaze Orange, Ice Blue, Midnight Black | Black, Gold, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 430 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 401,382 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,457 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/3.06" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Yes | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.74 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 5.0 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 48 h | 67 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | C | A |
