- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno7 SE 5G vs Galaxy M52 5G
OPPO Reno7 SE 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What Reno7 SE 5G does better (6) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Display6.8
5.7Camera7.5
4.2Battery5.3
5.0Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno7 SE 5GGalaxy M52 5G
| Reno7 SE 5G | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.2 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76.4 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 173 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno7 SE 5G better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 400 nits+50%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 393 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Reno7 SE 5G?
- NFCNo · Reno7 SE 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Memory card slotNo · Reno7 SE 5G: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Reno7 SE 5G: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno7 SE 5G: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Gold | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 12 | One UI 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7


