- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno4 5G vs Galaxy A71 5G UW
OPPO Reno4 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
What Reno4 5G does better (8) and where Galaxy A71 5G UW wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Display6.6
6.8Camera7.5
4.2Battery3.3
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno4 5GGalaxy A71 5G UW
| Reno4 5G | Galaxy A71 5G UW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.3 mm | 162.8 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.7 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 188 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno4 5G better than Galaxy A71 5G UW?
- Wired charging65 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Galaxy A71 5G UW: No
- Dual SIMYes · Galaxy A71 5G UW: No
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 393 ppi+4%
- Weight183 g vs 188 g+3%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A71 5G UW better than Reno4 5G?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Memory card slotNo · Reno4 5G: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · Reno4 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Reno4 5G: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.7% vs 87.9%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 159.3 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Galactic Blue, Space Black, Purple | Prism Bricks Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 430 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.5 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 7.2 | One UI 2.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GvsOPPO Reno4 5G
6.46.6
vs
OPPO Reno4 5GvsHuawei P40 lite 5G
6.66.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UWvsXiaomi Poco X3 NFC
6.66.4
vs
Google Pixel 4a 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
6.76.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UWvsSamsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
6.66.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UWvsLG Velvet 5G
6.66.6