How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Reno15 Pro Mini vs iQOO Neo12

OPPO Reno15 Pro Mini vs Vivo iQOO Neo12

What Reno15 Pro Mini does better (8) and where iQOO Neo12 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Reno15 Pro Mini
OPPO · 2026Reno15 Pro Mini
9.4Score
8 advantages≈ $620
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo12
Vivo · 2026iQOO Neo12
9.5Score
13 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
8.1Display9.7
9.7Camera8.8
9.1Battery9.6
8.9Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Reno15 Pro MiniiQOO Neo12
72.4 × 151.2875.9 × 163.48.5
Reno15 Pro MiniiQOO Neo12Difference
Height151.2 mm163.4 mm−12.2 mm
Width72.4 mm75.9 mm−3.5 mm
Thickness8 mm8.5 mm−0.5 mm
Weight187 g225 g−38 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Reno15 Pro Mini better than iQOO Neo12?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo12: No
  3. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  4. Weight187 g vs 225 g+20%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo12: No
  6. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  7. Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is iQOO Neo12 better than Reno15 Pro Mini?

  1. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 9,000 mAh+45%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 185 Hz+54%
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  5. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  6. CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+42%
  7. Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 2,200 nits+22%
  8. Max video4K vs 8K
  9. Pixel density460 ppi vs 514 ppi+12%
  10. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
  11. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  12. Resolution (width)1,216 px vs 1,440 px+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO Neo12Vivo iQOO Neo12≈ $6209.5
Design
Weight187 g225 g
Thickness8 mm8.5 mm
Height151.2 mm163.4 mm
Width72.4 mm75.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i—
ColoursDusk Brown (Cocoa Brown), Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Crystal PinkBlack, Blue, Gray
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px3,200 px
Pixel density460 ppi514 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits2,200 nits
Measured brightness1,237 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.5%90.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8450Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.25 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUMali-G720 MC7Adreno 840
AnTuTu score1,605,644—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,201—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,039—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.56"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.5×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh9,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)17.3 h—
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min57%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)1.18 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16OriginOS 7
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare