- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno15 Pro Max vs X300 Ultra
OPPO Reno15 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Ultra
What Reno15 Pro Max does better (5) and where X300 Ultra wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.6
8.5Performance9.5
9.7Camera9.8
9.6Battery9.3
9.5Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 Pro MaxX300 Ultra
| Reno15 Pro Max | X300 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 232 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 Pro Max better than X300 Ultra?
- Weight205 g vs 232 g+13%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is X300 Ultra better than Reno15 Pro Max?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,321 vs 11,494+82%
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 4,500 nits2.5×
- AnTuTu score2,131,620 vs 2,723,497+28%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+42%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 4.7×+34%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 510 ppi+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Armor glass |
| Colours | Dusk Brown, Aura Gold | Eclipse Black, Victory Green, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 3,168 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,935 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 90.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,131,620 | 2,723,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,321 | 11,494 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,075 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.12" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 4.7× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 15.8 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 59% | 66% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 57 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6
vs
Apple iPhone 18 Pro MaxvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi 17 UltravsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.79.6
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi 17T ProvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.79.6
vs
Honor 600 ProvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6


