- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno15 Pro Max vs X300 FE
OPPO Reno15 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 FE
What Reno15 Pro Max does better (7) and where X300 FE wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display8.3
8.5Performance8.9
9.7Camera9.6
9.6Battery9.6
9.5Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno15 Pro MaxX300 FE
| Reno15 Pro Max | X300 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 150.8 mm | +10.5 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 71.8 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 190 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno15 Pro Max better than X300 FE?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+7%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Charged in 30 min59% vs 55%+7%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+6%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,216 px+5%
Why is X300 FE better than Reno15 Pro Max?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 5,000 nits2.8×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,321 vs 9,356+48%
- AnTuTu score2,131,620 vs 2,234,101+5%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+17%
- Weight205 g vs 190 g+8%
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 461 ppi+2%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 150.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Dusk Brown, Aura Gold | Misty Purple (Lilac Purple), Radiant White, Cool Black (Noir Black), Green, Urban Olive |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,774 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 829 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,131,620 | 2,234,101 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,321 | 9,356 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,189 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 18.8 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 59% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 59 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6
vs
Apple iPhone 18 Pro MaxvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi 17 UltravsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.79.6
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MaxvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6
vs
Xiaomi 17T ProvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.79.6
vs
Honor 600 ProvsOPPO Reno15 Pro Max
9.69.6


