- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno12 Pro vs T909
OPPO Reno12 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909
What Reno12 Pro does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.8Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 ProT909
| Reno12 Pro | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 109 mm | +52.5 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 44 mm | +30.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 22 mm | −14.6 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 95 g | +85 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 Pro better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 600 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 22 mm3×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Reno12 Pro?
- Weight180 g vs 95 g+89%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Space Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish Malhotra | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | — |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,380 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 681,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,625 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 854 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 14.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | ColorOS 14.1 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
