- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno12 F 4G vs Phone Quintus
OPPO Reno12 F 4G vs Volla Phone Quintus
What Reno12 F 4G does better (9) and where Phone Quintus wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display7.9
6.9Camera6.8
6.8Battery3.2
4.0Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno12 F 4GPhone Quintus
| Reno12 F 4G | Phone Quintus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 164.2 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.7 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.8 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than Phone Quintus?
- Peak brightness2,100 nits vs 980 nits2.1×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+6%
- Memory card slotYes · Phone Quintus: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight187 g vs 205 g+9%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.8 mm+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+4%
Why is Phone Quintus better than Reno12 F 4G?
- 5GNo · Reno12 F 4G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 90.5%+4%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | — |
| Colours | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,100 nits | 980 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 90.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 431,840 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,468 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
