- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno11 Pro vs Camon 30 Pro
OPPO Reno11 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What Reno11 Pro does better (9) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display9.5
7.7Performance7.4
8.3Camera9.1
6.3Battery7.2
7.9Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno11 ProCamon 30 Pro
| Reno11 Pro | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 189 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno11 Pro better than Camon 30 Pro?
- AnTuTu score1,292,987 vs 949,357+36%
- Telephoto cameraYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 70 W+14%
- Charged in 30 min135% vs 64%2.1×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Weight181 g vs 189 g+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Reno11 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,563 vs 3,931+10%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.1 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC | — |
| Colours | Pearl White, Rock Grey | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,292,987 | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,563 | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 135% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.18 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
