- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Reno10 Pro vs T909c
OPPO Reno10 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909c
What Reno10 Pro does better (5) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.6Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Reno10 ProT909c
| Reno10 Pro | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 129 mm | +33.3 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 44 mm | +30.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18 mm | −10.1 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 80 g | +105 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Reno10 Pro better than T909c?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 600 mAh7.7×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909c: No
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 18 mm2.3×
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than Reno10 Pro?
- Weight185 g vs 80 g2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Glass protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | — |
| Colours | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | — |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 793 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | — |
| AnTuTu score | 495,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,795 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
