- dotrising.com
- Compare
- K13 vs Pova Slim
OPPO K13 vs Tecno Pova Slim
What K13 does better (14) and where Pova Slim wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
K13Pova Slim
| K13 | Pova Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 164.2 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 6 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 156 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K13 better than Pova Slim?
- AnTuTu score903,972 vs 613,165+47%
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+36%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,977 vs 1,988+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Pova Slim: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Dual SIMYes · Pova Slim: No
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Pova Slim better than K13?
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 4,500 nits3.8×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight208 g vs 156 g+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 440 ppi+11%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+9%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 6 mm+42%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 89.1%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Icy Purple, Prism Black, White | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,578 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 903,972 | 613,165 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,977 | 1,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 62% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
