- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Find X9 Pro vs T909c
OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909c
What Find X9 Pro does better (7) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
9.0Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Find X9 ProT909c
| Find X9 Pro | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 129 mm | +32.3 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 44 mm | +32.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 18 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Weight | 224 g | 80 g | +144 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Find X9 Pro better than T909c?
- Battery capacity7,500 mAh vs 600 mAh12.5×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909c: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909c: No
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 18 mm2.2×
- eSIMYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than Find X9 Pro?
- Weight224 g vs 80 g2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 224 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Silk White, Titanium Charcoal, Velvet Red | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | — |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | — |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,175 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 4.21 GHz | — |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | — |
| AnTuTu score | 2,719,560 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,697 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,808 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.5 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,500 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 21.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | — |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | ColorOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 80 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
