- dotrising.com
- Compare
- F29 vs Armor X16 Pro
OPPO F29 vs UleFone Armor X16 Pro
What F29 does better (13) and where Armor X16 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display5.8
6.1Camera6.1
8.6Battery8.6
6.7Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
F29Armor X16 Pro
| F29 | Armor X16 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 173.8 mm | −12.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 83.4 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 18 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 395 g | −210 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is F29 better than Armor X16 Pro?
- Weight185 g vs 395 g2.1×
- OLED panelYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 269 ppi+46%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 18 mm2.3×
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 910 nits+32%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 71.3%+26%
Why is Armor X16 Pro better than F29?
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 10,360 mAh+59%
- NFCNo · F29: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · F29: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · F29: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 395 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 173.8 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Deep Purple, Glacier Blue | Wasteland Shadow/Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 910 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 71.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 10,360 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 1.12 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 115 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
