- dotrising.com
- Compare
- A94 5G vs Galaxy M52 5G
OPPO A94 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What A94 5G does better (5) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display6.8
6.5Camera7.5
3.2Battery5.3
7.1Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
A94 5GGalaxy M52 5G
| A94 5G | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 164.2 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 76.4 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 173 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A94 5G better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 400 nits2×
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M52 5G: No
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 393 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than A94 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · A94 5G: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.4 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | ColorOS 11.1 | One UI 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7


