- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Ace 5 Ultra vs Reno13 FS 5G
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra vs OPPO Reno13 FS 5G
What Ace 5 Ultra does better (10) and where Reno13 FS 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.3
8.6Camera8.8
9.4Battery8.1
8.3Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Ace 5 UltraReno13 FS 5G
| Ace 5 Ultra | Reno13 FS 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 162.2 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 192 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Ace 5 Ultra better than Reno13 FS 5G?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,700 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+16%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- CPU frequency3.73 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+70%
- Dual SIMYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 394 ppi+14%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
- Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,080 px+18%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Reno13 FS 5G better than Ace 5 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx9+80%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 180 Hz+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Ace 5 Ultra: Yes
- Weight206 g vs 192 g+7%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.1% vs 92.2%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | Crystal Shield Glass | — |
| Colours | Blue, Black, Titanium | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,272 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 92.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.73 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,948,304 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,564 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,144 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,700 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 77% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | ColorOS 15 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
