How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. RedMagic 9 Pro vs X200 Pro

nubia RedMagic 9 Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro

What RedMagic 9 Pro does better (3) and where X200 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
nubia · 2024RedMagic 9 Pro
9.3Score
3 advantages
vs
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
12 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
9.1Display9.1
8.9Camera9.7
9.1Battery8.9
9.2Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

RedMagic 9 ProX200 Pro
76.4 × 1648.976 × 162.48.2
RedMagic 9 ProX200 ProDifference
Height164 mm162.4 mm+1.6 mm
Width76.4 mm76 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness8.9 mm8.2 mm+0.7 mm
Weight229 g223 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is RedMagic 9 Pro better than X200 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+8%
  2. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio93.7% vs 90.3%+4%

Why is X200 Pro better than RedMagic 9 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 4,500 nits2.8×
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · RedMagic 9 Pro: Yes
  3. Wireless chargingNo · RedMagic 9 Pro: Yes
  4. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  5. Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
  6. 4K selfie videoNo · RedMagic 9 Pro: Yes
  7. eSIMNo · RedMagic 9 Pro: Yes
  8. Pixel density400 ppi vs 452 ppi+13%
  9. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+10%
  10. Weight229 g vs 223 g+3%
  11. Resolution (width)1,116 px vs 1,260 px+13%
  12. Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight229 g223 g
Thickness8.9 mm8.2 mm
Height164 mm162.4 mm
Width76.4 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass 5Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)
Colours—Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,116 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,480 px2,800 px
Pixel density400 ppi452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,881 nits
Screen-to-body ratio93.7%90.3%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process—3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score—2,609,095
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,173
Memory
RAM—16 GB
Storage (max)—1,024 GB
Storage (base)—256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.28"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.7×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—15.2 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—73%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—30 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USB—USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Loudspeaker loudness—-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
Sensorsproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprintFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceRedmagic OS 9Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare