- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Phone (3a) Pro vs T909
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro vs Tel.Me. T909
What Phone (3a) Pro does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
8.5Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phone (3a) ProT909
| Phone (3a) Pro | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 109 mm | +54.5 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 44 mm | +33.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 22 mm | −13.6 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 95 g | +116 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phone (3a) Pro better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 600 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 22 mm2.6×
- eSIMYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Phone (3a) Pro?
- Weight211 g vs 95 g2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | — |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,307 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 820,097 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,327 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,061 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 13.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 50 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | Nothing OS 4.0 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 43 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) ProvsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.68.6
vs
Nothing Phone (4a) ProvsNothing Phone (3a) Pro
9.28.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (China)vsNothing Phone (3a) Pro
8.58.6
vs
OPPO Reno13 F 4GvsNothing Phone (3a) Pro
8.68.6
vs
Apple iPhone 11vsTel.Me. T909
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GvsTel.Me. T909