How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 6310 (2021) vs KX-TU250

Nokia 6310 (2021) vs Panasonic KX-TU250

What 6310 (2021) does better (5) and where KX-TU250 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 6310 (2021)
Nokia · 20216310 (2021)
3.5Score
5 advantages≈ $65
vs
Panasonic KX-TU250
Panasonic · 2022KX-TU250
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
2.1Display2.0
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

6310 (2021)KX-TU250
56 × 135.514.152 × 12715
6310 (2021)KX-TU250Difference
Height135.5 mm127 mm+8.5 mm
Width56 mm52 mm+4 mm
Thickness14.1 mm15 mm−0.9 mm
Weight98 g106 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 6310 (2021) better than KX-TU250?

  1. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · KX-TU250: No
  2. Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
  3. Weight98 g vs 106 g+8%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio32% vs 27%+19%
  5. Thickness14.1 mm vs 15 mm+6%

Why is KX-TU250 better than 6310 (2021)?

  1. Battery capacity1,150 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+30%
  2. Pixel density143 ppi vs 167 ppi+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight98 g106 g
Thickness14.1 mm15 mm
Height135.5 mm127 mm
Width56 mm52 mm
ColoursYellow, Black, Dark GreenBlack
Display
Screen size2.8″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDFarb-Display
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density143 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio32%27%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc 6531F—
Chip makerUnisoc—
Memory
RAM0.008 GB—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—1 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,150 mAh1,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMNoNo
Bluetooth5—
NFCNo—
USBmicroUSBUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SAR (head)0.97 W/kg—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare