How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 6300 4G vs T909

Nokia 6300 4G vs Tel.Me. T909

What 6300 4G does better (5) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 6300 4G
Nokia · 20206300 4G
3.6Score
5 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
vs
Tel.Me. T909
Tel.Me.T909
1 advantage
2.1Display3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

6300 4GT909
53 × 131.413.744 × 10922
6300 4GT909Difference
Height131.4 mm109 mm+22.4 mm
Width53 mm44 mm+9 mm
Thickness13.7 mm22 mm−8.3 mm
Weight105 g95 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 6300 4G better than T909?

  1. Battery capacity1,500 mAh vs 600 mAh2.5×
  2. Memory card slotYes · T909: No
  3. Dual SIMYes · T909: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
  5. Thickness13.7 mm vs 22 mm+61%

Why is T909 better than 6300 4G?

  1. Weight105 g vs 95 g+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 6300 4GNokia 6300 4G≈ $853.6
Design
Weight105 g95 g
Thickness13.7 mm22 mm
Height131.4 mm109 mm
Width53 mm44 mm
FramePlastic—
BackPlastic—
ColoursLight Charcoal, White, Cyan Green3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″—
PanelTFT LCDMonochrome graphic
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px—
Resolution (height)320 px—
Pixel density167 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio25.6%—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm QC8909 Snapdragon 210—
Chip makerQualcomm—
Process28 nm—
CPU cores4—
CPU frequency1.1 GHz—
GPUAdreno 304—
Memory
RAM0 GB—
Storage (max)4 GB—
Storage (base)4 GB—
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity1,500 mAh600 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4—
Bluetooth4—
NFCNo—
USBmicroUSB 2.0—
Satellite navigationGLONASS—
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SAR (head)1.09 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchKaiOS 2.5—
PlatformiOS—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare