- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 5310 (2020) vs T909
Nokia 5310 (2020) vs Tel.Me. T909
What 5310 (2020) does better (6) and where T909 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
2.1Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
5310 (2020)T909
| 5310 (2020) | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 123.7 mm | 109 mm | +14.7 mm |
| Width | 52.4 mm | 44 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 22 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Weight | 88 g | 95 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 5310 (2020) better than T909?
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 600 mAh2×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
- Weight88 g vs 95 g+8%
- Thickness13.1 mm vs 22 mm+68%
Why is T909 better than 5310 (2020)?
T909 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 88 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 13.1 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 123.7 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 52.4 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | White/Red, Black/Red | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 27.5% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6260A | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.008 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | microUSB 1.1 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| SAR (head) | 1.13 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
