- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 300 Charge vs KX-TU260
Nokia 300 Charge vs Panasonic KX-TU260
What 300 Charge does better (3) and where KX-TU260 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Display2.0
2.3Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
300 ChargeKX-TU260
| 300 Charge | KX-TU260 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 136.6 mm | 133 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 55 mm | = |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 15 mm | = |
| Weight | 138 g | 119 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 Charge better than KX-TU260?
- Battery capacity3,700 mAh vs 1,500 mAh2.5×
- Dual SIMYes · KX-TU260: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · KX-TU260: No
Why is KX-TU260 better than 300 Charge?
- Weight138 g vs 119 g+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio23.7% vs 24.5%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 138 g | 119 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 136.6 mm | 133 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Green, Sandstone, Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 23.7% | 24.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc SC6531E | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.004 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,700 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
