- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 225 4G vs 6310 (2021)
Nokia 225 4G vs Nokia 6310 (2021)
What 225 4G does better (5) and where 6310 (2021) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Display2.1
2.0Battery2.0
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
225 4G6310 (2021)
| 225 4G | 6310 (2021) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 124.7 mm | 135.5 mm | −10.8 mm |
| Width | 51 mm | 56 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 14.1 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 98 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 225 4G better than 6310 (2021)?
- RAM0.062 GB vs 0.008 GB8×
- Dual SIMYes · 6310 (2021): No
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
- Weight90 g vs 98 g+9%
- Thickness13.7 mm vs 14.1 mm+3%
Why is 6310 (2021) better than 225 4G?
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio28% vs 32%+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 98 g |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 14.1 mm |
| Height | 124.7 mm | 135.5 mm |
| Width | 51 mm | 56 mm |
| Colours | Black, Classic Blue, Metallic Sand | Yellow, Black, Dark Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | 32% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc UMS9117 | Unisoc 6531F |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | 0.008 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,150 mAh | 1,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| SAR (head) | 1.63 W/kg | 0.97 W/kg |
