How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 220 4G (2024) vs KX-TU260

Nokia 220 4G (2024) vs Panasonic KX-TU260

What 220 4G (2024) does better (5) and where KX-TU260 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 220 4G (2024)
Nokia · 2024220 4G (2024)
3.5Score
5 advantages≈ $45
vs
Panasonic KX-TU260
Panasonic · 2026KX-TU260
3.5Score
2 advantages≈ $55
2.1Display2.0
2.1Battery2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

220 4G (2024)KX-TU260
54.2 × 127.311.655 × 13315
220 4G (2024)KX-TU260Difference
Height127.3 mm133 mm−5.7 mm
Width54.2 mm55 mm−0.8 mm
Thickness11.6 mm15 mm−3.4 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 220 4G (2024) better than KX-TU260?

  1. Dual SIMYes · KX-TU260: No
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · KX-TU260: No
  3. Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio35.2% vs 24.5%+44%
  5. Thickness11.6 mm vs 15 mm+29%

Why is KX-TU260 better than 220 4G (2024)?

  1. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+3%
  2. Pixel density143 ppi vs 167 ppi+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight—119 g
Thickness11.6 mm15 mm
Height127.3 mm133 mm
Width54.2 mm55 mm
ColoursBlack, PeachBlack
Display
Screen size2.8″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDFarb-Display
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density143 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Peak brightness—250 nits
Screen-to-body ratio35.2%24.5%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107—
Chip makerUnisoc—
Process22 nm—
CPU cores1—
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
RAM0.062 GB—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—1 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh1,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMYesNo
Bluetooth55
NFCNo—
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SensorsNo—
Software
InterfaceSeries 30—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare