How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 215 4G vs Armor Mini 2

Nokia 215 4G vs UleFone Armor Mini 2

What 215 4G does better (5) and where Armor Mini 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 215 4G
Nokia · 2020215 4G
3.5Score
5 advantages≈ $45
vs
UleFone Armor Mini 2
UleFone · 2021Armor Mini 2
3.9Score
1 advantage≈ $45
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
2.0Battery2.2
3.1Features4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

215 4GArmor Mini 2
51 × 124.713.762.5 × 13816.6
215 4GArmor Mini 2Difference
Height124.7 mm138 mm−13.3 mm
Width51 mm62.5 mm−11.5 mm
Thickness13.7 mm16.6 mm−2.9 mm
Weight90 g158 g−68 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 215 4G better than Armor Mini 2?

  1. RAM0.062 GB vs 0.004 GB16×
  2. Weight90 g vs 158 g+75%
  3. Bluetooth5 vs 2.42.1×
  4. Screen-to-body ratio28% vs 20.7%+35%
  5. Thickness13.7 mm vs 16.6 mm+21%

Why is Armor Mini 2 better than 215 4G?

  1. Battery capacity1,150 mAh vs 2,100 mAh+83%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 215 4GNokia 215 4G≈ $453.5
Design
Weight90 g158 g
Thickness13.7 mm16.6 mm
Height124.7 mm138 mm
Width51 mm62.5 mm
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Scratch-proof glass
ColoursBlack, Cyan GreenDark Gray, Camouflage
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio28%20.7%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc UMS9117Mediatek MT6261D
Chip makerUnisocMediaTek
Memory
RAM0.062 GB0.004 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—0.3 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,150 mAh2,100 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth52.4
NFCNoNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
Sensors—No
SAR (head)1.63 W/kg—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare