- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 215 4G (2026) vs T909
Nokia 215 4G (2026) vs Tel.Me. T909
What 215 4G (2026) does better (5) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
2.1Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
215 4G (2026)T909
| 215 4G (2026) | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128.8 mm | 109 mm | +19.8 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 44 mm | +11 mm |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 22 mm | −9.2 mm |
| Weight | 104 g | 95 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 215 4G (2026) better than T909?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 600 mAh2.4×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
- Thickness12.8 mm vs 22 mm+72%
Why is T909 better than 215 4G (2026)?
- Weight104 g vs 95 g+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 104 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 128.8 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Black, Red | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 34.3% | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
