- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 215 4G (2026) vs OneTouch 4042s
Nokia 215 4G (2026) vs TCL OneTouch 4042s
What 215 4G (2026) does better (3) and where OneTouch 4042s wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
215 4G (2026)OneTouch 4042s
| 215 4G (2026) | OneTouch 4042s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128.8 mm | 137.5 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 57.5 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 13.6 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 104 g | 111 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 215 4G (2026) better than OneTouch 4042s?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · OneTouch 4042s: No
- Weight104 g vs 111 g+7%
- Thickness12.8 mm vs 13.6 mm+7%
Why is OneTouch 4042s better than 215 4G (2026)?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 104 g | 111 g |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 13.6 mm |
| Height | 128.8 mm | 137.5 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 57.5 mm |
| Colours | Black, Red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 34.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc UMS9117L |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
