- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 215 4G (2026) vs PMP 92
Nokia 215 4G (2026) vs Peaq PMP 92
What 215 4G (2026) does better (4) and where PMP 92 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
215 4G (2026)PMP 92
| 215 4G (2026) | PMP 92 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128.8 mm | 115 mm | +13.8 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 54 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 15 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 104 g | 60 g | +44 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 215 4G (2026) better than PMP 92?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 800 mAh+81%
- Screen size2.8″ vs 1.8″+58%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · PMP 92: No
- Thickness12.8 mm vs 15 mm+17%
Why is PMP 92 better than 215 4G (2026)?
- Weight104 g vs 60 g+73%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 104 g | 60 g |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 128.8 mm | 115 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 54 mm |
| Colours | Black, Red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 34.3% | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 0.08 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
