- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G vs TT150
Nokia 210 4G vs TTfone TT150
What 210 4G does better (3) and where TT150 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4GTT150
| 210 4G | TT150 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 105 mm | +21.1 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 47 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 12 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 70 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G better than TT150?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+45%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+36%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 126 px+90%
Why is TT150 better than 210 4G?
- Weight93 g vs 70 g+32%
- Thickness13 mm vs 12 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 70 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 105 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 47 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Silver | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 126 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 180 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Sensors | No | — |
