- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G vs T909c
Nokia 210 4G vs Tel.Me. T909c
What 210 4G does better (5) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4GT909c
| 210 4G | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 129 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 44 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 18 mm | −5 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 80 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G better than T909c?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 600 mAh2.4×
- Memory card slotYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909c: No
- Thickness13 mm vs 18 mm+38%
Why is T909c better than 210 4G?
- Weight93 g vs 80 g+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Silver | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
