- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G vs PMP 12
Nokia 210 4G vs Peaq PMP 12
What 210 4G does better (4) and where PMP 12 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4GPMP 12
| 210 4G | PMP 12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 115 mm | +11.1 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 54 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 15 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 60 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G better than PMP 12?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 800 mAh+81%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 1.8″+36%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · PMP 12: No
- Thickness13 mm vs 15 mm+15%
Why is PMP 12 better than 210 4G?
- Weight93 g vs 60 g+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 60 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 115 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 54 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Spreadtrum T107 |
| Chip maker | — | Spreadtrum |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
