- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G vs KX-TU260
Nokia 210 4G vs Panasonic KX-TU260
What 210 4G does better (5) and where KX-TU260 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4GKX-TU260
| 210 4G | KX-TU260 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 133 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 15 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 119 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G better than KX-TU260?
- Weight93 g vs 119 g+28%
- Dual SIMYes · KX-TU260: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · KX-TU260: No
- Thickness13 mm vs 15 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio28% vs 24.5%+14%
Why is KX-TU260 better than 210 4G?
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 1 MP4×
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 119 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 133 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | 24.5% |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
