- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G vs Neo Mini
Nokia 210 4G vs Olympia Neo Mini
What 210 4G does better (1) and where Neo Mini wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4GNeo Mini
| 210 4G | Neo Mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 148 mm | −21.9 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 74 mm | −23.5 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 124 g | −31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G better than Neo Mini?
- Weight93 g vs 124 g+34%
Why is Neo Mini better than 210 4G?
- RAM0.062 GB vs 3 GB48×
- Main camera0.3 MP vs 5 MP16.7×
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 2,800 mAh+93%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 5″2.1×
- Selfie camera0.3 MP vs 2 MP6.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 124 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | — |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 148 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 74 mm |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Silver | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 0.062 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 32 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 5 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | 2 MP |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 2,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Sensors | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | G |
