How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 210 4G vs Neo

Nokia 210 4G vs Olympia Neo

What 210 4G does better (1) and where Neo wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 210 4G
Nokia · 2026210 4G
3.6Score
1 advantage
vs
Olympia Neo
Olympia · 2026Neo
3.6Score
6 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
2.1Camera2.4
2.1Battery2.3
3.1Features2.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

210 4GNeo
50.5 × 126.11370.8 × 156.29.3
210 4GNeoDifference
Height126.1 mm156.2 mm−30.1 mm
Width50.5 mm70.8 mm−20.3 mm
Thickness13 mm9.3 mm+3.7 mm
Weight93 g171 g−78 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 210 4G better than Neo?

  1. Weight93 g vs 171 g+84%

Why is Neo better than 210 4G?

  1. RAM0.062 GB vs 4 GB64×
  2. Main camera0.3 MP vs 8 MP26.7×
  3. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 2,750 mAh+90%
  4. Screen size2.4″ vs 5.5″2.3×
  5. Selfie camera0.3 MP vs 5 MP16.7×
  6. Thickness13 mm vs 9.3 mm+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Olympia NeoOlympia Neo≈ $1303.6
Design
Weight93 g171 g
Thickness13 mm9.3 mm
Height126.1 mm156.2 mm
Width50.5 mm70.8 mm
Ingress protection—IP44
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursDark Blue, Silver—
Display
Screen size2.4″5.5″
PanelTFT LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px—
Resolution (height)320 px—
Pixel density167 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio28%—
Memory
RAM0.062 GB4 GB
Storage (max)—64 GB
Storage (base)—64 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP8 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Selfie camera0.3 MP5 MP
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh2,750 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth5—
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-C—
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
Fingerprint sensor—Rear
SensorsNofingerprint
Software
OS at launch—Android 15
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy class—G
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare