How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 210 4G vs 235 4G (2026)

Nokia 210 4G vs Nokia 235 4G (2026)

What 210 4G does better (2) and where 235 4G (2026) wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 210 4G
Nokia · 2026210 4G
3.6Score
2 advantages
vs
Nokia 235 4G (2026)
Nokia · 2026235 4G (2026)
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
2.1Camera2.1
2.1Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

210 4G235 4G (2026)
50.5 × 126.11355.8 × 128.912.9
210 4G235 4G (2026)Difference
Height126.1 mm128.9 mm−2.8 mm
Width50.5 mm55.8 mm−5.3 mm
Thickness13 mm12.9 mm+0.1 mm
Weight93 g106 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 210 4G better than 235 4G (2026)?

  1. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
  2. Weight93 g vs 106 g+14%

Why is 235 4G (2026) better than 210 4G?

  1. Main camera0.3 MP vs 2 MP6.7×
  2. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio28% vs 33.8%+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight93 g106 g
Thickness13 mm12.9 mm
Height126.1 mm128.9 mm
Width50.5 mm55.8 mm
ColoursDark Blue, SilverBlack, Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelTFT LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio28%33.8%
Performance
Chipset—Unisoc T107
Chip maker—Unisoc
Memory
RAM0.062 GB0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP2 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Selfie camera0.3 MP0.3 MP
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsNoNo
Software
OS at launch—Nokia Series 30+
Platform—Other
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare