- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 210 4G 2026 vs 300 Charge
Nokia 210 4G 2026 vs Nokia 300 Charge
What 210 4G 2026 does better (2) and where 300 Charge wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.1
2.1Battery2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
210 4G 2026300 Charge
| 210 4G 2026 | 300 Charge | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 136.6 mm | −10.5 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 15 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 138 g | −45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 210 4G 2026 better than 300 Charge?
- Weight93 g vs 138 g+49%
- Thickness14 mm vs 15 mm+8%
Why is 300 Charge better than 210 4G 2026?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 3,700 mAh2.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 138 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 136.6 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Blue | Green, Sandstone, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 23.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T127 | Unisoc SC6531E |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 3,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | — | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Nokia Series 30+ | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
