How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 210 4G 2026 vs 235 4G (2026)

Nokia 210 4G 2026 vs Nokia 235 4G (2026)

What 210 4G 2026 does better (2) and where 235 4G (2026) wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 210 4G 2026
Nokia · 2026210 4G 2026
3.5Score
2 advantages≈ $65
vs
Nokia 235 4G (2026)
Nokia · 2026235 4G (2026)
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
2.0Display2.1
2.1Camera2.1
2.1Battery2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

210 4G 2026235 4G (2026)
50.5 × 126.11455.8 × 128.912.9
210 4G 2026235 4G (2026)Difference
Height126.1 mm128.9 mm−2.8 mm
Width50.5 mm55.8 mm−5.3 mm
Thickness14 mm12.9 mm+1 mm
Weight93 g106 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 210 4G 2026 better than 235 4G (2026)?

  1. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
  2. Weight93 g vs 106 g+14%

Why is 235 4G (2026) better than 210 4G 2026?

  1. Main camera0.3 MP vs 2 MP6.7×
  2. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  3. Thickness14 mm vs 12.9 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight93 g106 g
Thickness14 mm12.9 mm
Height126.1 mm128.9 mm
Width50.5 mm55.8 mm
ColoursBlueBlack, Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio—33.8%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T127Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP2 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Selfie camera0.3 MP0.3 MP
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launchNokia Series 30+Nokia Series 30+
PlatformOtherOther
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare