- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 150 (2023) vs KX-TU250
Nokia 150 (2023) vs Panasonic KX-TU250
What 150 (2023) does better (2) and where KX-TU250 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Display2.0
2.1Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
150 (2023)KX-TU250
| 150 (2023) | KX-TU250 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 131 mm | 127 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 50.6 mm | 52 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 15.2 mm | 15 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 106 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 150 (2023) better than KX-TU250?
- Dual SIMYes · KX-TU250: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · KX-TU250: No
Why is KX-TU250 better than 150 (2023)?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 106 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 15.2 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 131 mm | 127 mm |
| Width | 50.6 mm | 52 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Black, Cyan, Red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 26.9% | 27% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | microUSB 1.1 | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | No | — |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
