How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 150 (2023) vs 225 4G

Nokia 150 (2023) vs Nokia 225 4G

What 150 (2023) does better (1) and where 225 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 150 (2023)
Nokia · 2023150 (2023)
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $65
vs
Nokia 225 4G
Nokia · 2020225 4G
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
2.1Battery2.0
2.0Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

150 (2023)225 4G
50.6 × 13115.251 × 124.713.7
150 (2023)225 4GDifference
Height131 mm124.7 mm+6.3 mm
Width50.6 mm51 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness15.2 mm13.7 mm+1.5 mm
Weight106 g90 g+16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 150 (2023) better than 225 4G?

  1. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,150 mAh+26%

Why is 225 4G better than 150 (2023)?

  1. Weight106 g vs 90 g+18%
  2. Thickness15.2 mm vs 13.7 mm+11%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio26.9% vs 28%+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 225 4GNokia 225 4G≈ $653.6
Design
Weight106 g90 g
Thickness15.2 mm13.7 mm
Height131 mm124.7 mm
Width50.6 mm51 mm
Ingress protectionIP52—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
ColoursBlack, Cyan, RedBlack, Classic Blue, Metallic Sand
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio26.9%28%
Performance
Chipset—Unisoc UMS9117
Chip maker—Unisoc
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—0.3 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity1,450 mAh1,150 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth—5
NFCNoNo
USBmicroUSB 1.1microUSB 2.0
USB version—2
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsNo—
SAR (head)—1.63 W/kg
Software
InterfaceSeries 30—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare