- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 150 (2020) vs T909
Nokia 150 (2020) vs Tel.Me. T909
What 150 (2020) does better (6) and where T909 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
2.1Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
150 (2020)T909
| 150 (2020) | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 132 mm | 109 mm | +23 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 44 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 22 mm | −7 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 95 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 150 (2020) better than T909?
- Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 600 mAh+70%
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
- Weight90 g vs 95 g+5%
- Thickness15 mm vs 22 mm+47%
Why is T909 better than 150 (2020)?
T909 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 132 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Cyan, Red, Black | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 26.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| SAR (head) | 0.43 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
