- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 125 vs T909c
Nokia 125 vs Tel.Me. T909c
What 125 does better (4) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
125T909c
| 125 | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 132 mm | 129 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 44 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 18 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 91 g | 80 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 125 better than T909c?
- Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 600 mAh+70%
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909c: No
- Thickness15 mm vs 18 mm+20%
Why is T909c better than 125?
- Weight91 g vs 80 g+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 91 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 132 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Black, White | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 26.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| SAR (head) | 0.43 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
