- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 125 vs OneTouch 4042s
Nokia 125 vs TCL OneTouch 4042s
What 125 does better (2) and where OneTouch 4042s wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
125OneTouch 4042s
| 125 | OneTouch 4042s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 132 mm | 137.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 57.5 mm | −7 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 13.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 91 g | 111 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 125 better than OneTouch 4042s?
- Weight91 g vs 111 g+22%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · OneTouch 4042s: No
Why is OneTouch 4042s better than 125?
- Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+47%
- Memory card slotNo · 125: Yes
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Thickness15 mm vs 13.6 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 91 g | 111 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 13.6 mm |
| Height | 132 mm | 137.5 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 57.5 mm |
| Colours | Black, White | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 26.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek | Unisoc UMS9117L |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| SAR (head) | 0.43 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
