- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 vs KX-TU260
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 vs Panasonic KX-TU260
What 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 does better (3) and where KX-TU260 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.0
2.1Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G 2nd Edition 2024KX-TU260
| 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 | KX-TU260 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121.5 mm | 133 mm | −11.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 55 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 15 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 93 g | 119 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 better than KX-TU260?
- Weight93 g vs 119 g+28%
- Dual SIMYes · KX-TU260: No
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 15 mm+4%
Why is KX-TU260 better than 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+3%
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 167 ppi+50%
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2.4″+33%
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 240 px2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | 119 g |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | 133 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 55 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 24.5% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
