- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 vs 5310 (2024)
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 vs Nokia 5310 (2024)
What 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 does better (0) and where 5310 (2024) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.1
2.1Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 4G 2nd Edition 20245310 (2024)
| 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 | 5310 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 121.5 mm | 132 mm | −10.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 57 mm | −7 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 13.1 mm | +1.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 better than 5310 (2024)?
105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 5310 (2024) better than 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024?
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2.8″+56%
- Pixel density111 ppi vs 143 ppi+29%
- Resolution (width)120 px vs 240 px2×
- Thickness14.4 mm vs 13.1 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 93 g | — |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | 13.1 mm |
| Height | 121.5 mm | 132 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 57 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | White/Red, Black/Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 32.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc 6531F |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.008 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
