- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Razr Fold vs Signature 27
Motorola Razr Fold vs Motorola Signature 27
What Razr Fold does better (6) and where Signature 27 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.6
9.2Performance9.8
9.1Camera9.8
9.7Battery9.7
9.6Features9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr FoldSignature 27
| Razr Fold | Signature 27 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 162.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 144.5 mm | 76.4 mm | +68.1 mm |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 7.2 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 243 g | 191 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr Fold better than Signature 27?
- eSIMYes · Signature 27: No
- Screen size8.1″ vs 6.8″+19%
- Resolution (width)2,232 px vs 1,264 px+77%
- Thickness4.7 mm vs 7.2 mm+53%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
- USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%
Why is Signature 27 better than Razr Fold?
- AnTuTu score2,342,132 vs 5,153,2942.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,804 vs 12,703+44%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 5.01 GHz+32%
- Weight243 g vs 191 g+27%
- Pixel density410 ppi vs 449 ppi+10%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Process3 nm vs 2 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 243 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 162.1 mm |
| Width | 144.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Blackened Blue, Lily White | Pantone: Coal Smoke, Capulet Olive |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.1″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO P-OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,232 px | 1,264 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,484 px | 2,780 px |
| Pixel density | 410 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,200 nits | 6,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,510 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.9% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.8 GHz | 5.01 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 829 | Adreno 850 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,342,132 | 5,153,294 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,804 | 12,703 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,152 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 16.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 59 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 18 Pro MaxvsMotorola Signature 27
9.69.7
vs
Xiaomi 17 UltravsMotorola Signature 27
9.79.7
vs
Vivo X300 UltravsMotorola Signature 27
9.79.7
vs
Xiaomi 17T ProvsMotorola Signature 27
9.79.7
vs
Honor 600 ProvsMotorola Signature 27
9.69.7
vs
OPPO Find X9 UltravsMotorola Signature 27
9.79.7


