dotrising.com
Compare
Moto S50 vs Galaxy S24 FE

Motorola Moto S50 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

What Moto S50 does better (10) and where Galaxy S24 FE wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Moto S50

8.7Score

10 advantages≈ $300

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

9 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

8.0Display8.1

9.0Camera9.3

6.2Battery3.8

9.1Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto S50Galaxy S24 FE

	Moto S50	Galaxy S24 FE	Difference
Height	154.1 mm	162 mm	−7.9 mm
Width	71.2 mm	77.3 mm	−6.1 mm
Thickness	8.1 mm	8 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	170 g	213 g	−43 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto S50 better than Galaxy S24 FE?

Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,900 nits+58%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
Charged in 30 min115% vs 50%2.3×
Weight170 g vs 213 g+25%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Pixel density460 ppi vs 385 ppi+19%
Resolution (width)1,272 px vs 1,080 px+18%
Screen-to-body ratio94.4% vs 88%+7%

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than Moto S50?

Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+9%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+24%
Max video4K vs 8K
eSIMNo · Moto S50: Yes
Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto S50≈ $3008.7	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8
Design
Weight	170 g	213 g
Thickness	8.1 mm	8 mm
Height	154.1 mm	162 mm
Width	71.2 mm	77.3 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Nautical Blue, Latte, Poinciana	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow
Display
Screen size	6.4″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO P-OLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,272 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,670 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,372 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	94.4%	88%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300	Exynos 2400e
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,548,896
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,299
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,889
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.5"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,310 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	68 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	115%	50%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	42 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A