- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G84 vs Galaxy F34
Motorola Moto G84 vs Samsung Galaxy F34
What Moto G84 does better (11) and where Galaxy F34 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display7.5
8.0Camera8.0
4.3Battery7.5
6.8Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G84Galaxy F34
| Moto G84 | Galaxy F34 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 161.7 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.2 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.8 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 208 g | −41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G84 better than Galaxy F34?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F34: No
- Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits+30%
- Weight167 g vs 208 g+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 396 ppi+2%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.8 mm+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.7% vs 83.1%+3%
Why is Galaxy F34 better than Moto G84?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta | Electric Black, Mystic Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 996 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 83.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Exynos 1280 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
| AnTuTu score | 389,015 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,824 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.89 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 5.1 |
