dotrising.com
Compare
Moto G57 Power vs Poco F7 Pro

Motorola Moto G57 Power vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

What Moto G57 Power does better (5) and where Poco F7 Pro wins (22) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Moto G57 Power

8.0Score

5 advantages≈ $570

Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Pro

9.3Score

22 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

7.0Display9.1

6.4Performance8.6

5.8Camera9.0

8.3Battery8.1

7.7Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto G57 PowerPoco F7 Pro

	Moto G57 Power	Poco F7 Pro	Difference
Height	166.2 mm	160.3 mm	+5.9 mm
Width	76.5 mm	75 mm	+1.5 mm
Thickness	8.6 mm	8.1 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	211 g	206 g	+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto G57 Power better than Poco F7 Pro?

Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+17%
eSIMYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
Repairability classA vs C
Drop resistance classA vs C

Why is Poco F7 Pro better than Moto G57 Power?

AnTuTu score829,894 vs 2,065,2652.5×
Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,892 vs 6,6612.3×
Peak brightness1,050 nits vs 3,200 nits3×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
OLED panelNo · Moto G57 Power: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G57 Power: Yes
Selfie camera8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+38%
Pixel density392 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto G57 Power≈ $5708.0	Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro≈ $5809.3
Design
Weight	211 g	206 g
Thickness	8.6 mm	8.1 mm
Height	166.2 mm	160.3 mm
Width	76.5 mm	75 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Eco leather	Glass
Ingress protection	IP64	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Pantone: Fluidity, Pink Lemonade, Corsair, Meteorite, Regatta	Black, Blue, Silver
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,050 nits	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,478 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.8%	89.3%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Adreno	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	829,894	2,065,265
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,892	6,661
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,921
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	7,000 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	81%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.1	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	64 h	70 h
Repairability class	A	C
Drop resistance class	A	C