- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G50 vs Redmi Note 11 4G
Motorola Moto G50 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
What Moto G50 does better (5) and where Redmi Note 11 4G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display5.3
4.2Camera5.8
4.0Battery4.6
5.7Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G50Redmi Note 11 4G
| Moto G50 | Redmi Note 11 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 162 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 181 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G50 better than Redmi Note 11 4G?
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 11 4G: No
- NFCYes · Redmi Note 11 4G: No
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 11 4G better than Moto G50?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 405 ppi+51%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G50: Yes
- Weight192 g vs 181 g+6%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Steel Gray, Aqua Green | Carbon Gray, Pebble White, Sea Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 362 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 83.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,916 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,620 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 291 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12.5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9
5.84.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GvsVivo Y33s
5.85.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GvsOPPO A95
5.85.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GvsOPPO F19
5.85.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 5G
5.85.8