- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G50 5G vs Galaxy F22
Motorola Moto G50 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F22
What Moto G50 5G does better (5) and where Galaxy F22 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display5.8
4.2Camera5.7
4.0Battery6.6
5.6Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G50 5GGalaxy F22
| Moto G50 5G | Galaxy F22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 160 mm | +7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 203 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G50 5G better than Galaxy F22?
- 5GYes · Galaxy F22: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy F22: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy F22 better than Moto G50 5G?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G50 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G50 5G: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio80.5% vs 83.5%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Meteorite Grey | Denim Black, Denim Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 83.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.62 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
OnePlus Nord N200 5GvsMotorola Moto G50 5G
5.55.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsSamsung Galaxy F22
7.16.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F13vsSamsung Galaxy F22
6.26.1
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F22
6.16.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F22vsSamsung Galaxy M32
6.16.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy F22vsInfinix Note 11 Pro
6.15.9